AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
World of warships radar mod1/2/2024 Moskva to many players can be considered a contradicting ship. Her play style is unique at its tier, especially given the difficulty of controlling the ship. The data presented in the AA Defense sidebar section may be incorrect.įor a graphic summary of ships Tiers VIII thru XI see LittleWhiteMouse's "Actual AA DPS".Ī premium Russian heavy cruiser, Moskva is considered to be more of a battleship than a cruiser. In some cases, the periscope will be unusable for the remainder of that career.Warning. Now, we could “pretend” that the motor failed on it, or a lift cable broke, or whatever, but there is no indication of a failure, other than you cannot go to the station. However, if you are on patrol 31 December, 1944 to 01 January, 1945, with an existing boat that is eligible for ST Radar, the game’s attempt to “Upgrade” your Observation (Night) Periscope to the ST Radar version, it will fail, and then the Observation Periscope ceases to function. Option 4: Disable the ST across all boats except the TenchĪs it stands in the current, and all previous versions of FotRSU, if you do a new start after 01 January, 1945, you will have ST Radar, but will lose the SJ antenna displaying on the boat, which looks weird to me, but you do have a functional SJ and ST radar that displays on the PPI and NavMap (if Map Contacts are “On”). Option 3: Make a cloned conn “upgrade” for the boat (as in #2) and the ST Periscope, and then an UpgradePack for the ST that will eliminate the SJ antenna, but allows PPI and NavMap display (better for MapContacts “Off” people). Option 2: Make a cloned conn “upgrade” that might add the new ST Periscope, and then allow an add-on ST Radar that displays on the NavMap only (you do have to ‘qualify’ for a new conn). I like it when the Observation Periscope fails on 1st Jan 1945 OK folks – the game does not like changing the Observation periscope, but we do have a way around the issue, sort-of… but first some questions about this:
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |